Page 16 - İstanbul Ölçme Değerlendirme Dergisi
P. 16

The reasons for this shift in assessment modes are mul-  four in Mullis, Martin and von Davier, 2021).
          tiple. On one hand, assessment practices follow educa-
          tional practices. If students are taught in a digital envi-  Education making increasing use of computers is a nec-
          ronment, they should also be assessed in the same way.  essary  development  that  offers  many  opportunities.  Of
          It  also  allows  for  assessing  skills  that  were  difficult  to  course,  this  development  needs  to  be  monitored  and
          assess in a paper and pencil assessment (see TIMSS  supported–for example by teacher training. It also bears
          PSIs). Lastly, it also offers the collection of more informa-  some  risks–for  example  increasing  the  gap  between
          tion on how students are responding to the assessment,  higher  and  lower  achieving  students.  Computers  and
          for example the time on a task or if students answer the  software cannot substitute teachers but can be helpful
          test in a linear path (Question 1   2     3 …) or if they go  tools.
          back at the end to check their responses. All of this is
          captured in the log files of eAssessments (see Hastedt  Also  increasingly  using  computers  in  assessment  is  a
          and Sibberns, 2022).                                necessary  consequence  that  offers  also  additional  op-
          With respect to measurement, computer-based assess-  portunities  like  better  assessing  certain  skills  and  col-
          ments  have  some  advantages,  like  detecting  non-en-  lecting auxiliary information on students responding to a
          gaged students who then can be taken out of item cal-  test…and probably more options that we are yet even
          ibrations and assessments being better targeted to the  aware off today.
          students’ abilities–not only improving the measurement
          but also reducing the frustration of students who might
          receive a test that is much too hard for them (see chapter






      ıstanbul



    .

























          References

          Hastedt and Sibberns (2022): https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-030-38298-8 24-1
          Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O. (Eds.). (2017). TIMSS 2019 assessment frameworks. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College,
          TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. Retrieved from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/frameworks/.
          Mullis, I.V.S, Martin, M.O., von Davier, M. (Eds.). (2021). TIMSS 2023 Assessment Frameworks. Retrieved from Bos-
          ton College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website: https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2023
          Striethold et al (2021), Changes in Digital Learning During a Pandemic—Findings From the ICILS Teacher Panel, IEA

                                                                                     .
                                                                                    Istanbul
                                                                                            ÖLÇME
         16                                                                                      (        .
                                                                                             DEGERLENDIRME
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21