Page 40 - İstanbul Ölçme Değerlendirme Dergisi
P. 40

Blais, J. G., &Raîche, G. (2010). Features of the sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive
          testing according to two stopping rules. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11(4), 424-431.
          Cassady, J. C., &Gridley, B. E. (2005). The Effects of Online Formative and Summative Assessment on Test Anxiety
          and Performance. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 4(1). Retrieved from https://ejournals.bc.e-
          du/index.php/jtla/article/view/1648.
          Cui, Z., Liu, C., He, Y., &Chen, H. (2018). Comparison of algorithms that allow item review in computerized adaptive-
          testing , ACT Research Report No:17009.
          Geisinger, K. F., &Usher-Tate, B. J. (2016). A Brief History of Educational Testing and Psychometrics, In Craig, S.
          Wells ve MollyFoulkner-Bond (Eds.) Educational Measurement: From Foundations to Future, (p.3-20) New York,
          London: The Guilford Press.
          Hendrickson, A. (2007). An NCME Instructional Module on MultistageTesting. Educational Measurement: Issues and
          Practice, 26(2), 44–52. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00093.
          Jerrim, J. (2016). PISA 2012: how do results for the paper and computer tests compare? Assessment in Education:
          Principles. Policy&Practice, 23(4), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1147420.
          Jerrim, J., Micklewright, J., Heine, J.-H., Salzer, C., &McKeown, C. (2018). PISA 2015: how big is the ‘mode effect’
          and what has been done about it? Oxford Review of Education, 44(4), 476–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.
          2018.1430025.
          Johnson, M. &Green, S. (2006). On-Line Mathematics Assessment: The Impact of Mode on Performance and Ques-
          tion Answering Strategies. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4(5).
          Leucth, R. M. (2005). Computer-Adaptive Testing. Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science In Brian S. Eve-
          ritt& David C. Howell (Eds.)(p. 343-350), John Wiley&Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
          Luecht, R. M. &&Sireci, S. G. (2011). A Review of Models for Computer-BasedTesting, Research Report 2011-12,
          College Board.
          Lync, S. (2022). Adapting Paper-Based Tests for Computer Administration: Lessons Learned from 30 Years of Mode
      ıstanbul   larworks.umass.edu/pare/vol27/iss1/22
          Effects  Studies  in  Education.  Practical Assessment,  Research,  and  Evaluation,  vol.  27, Article  22,  https://scho-


    .     Meijer, R. R.,&Nering, M. L. (1999). Computerized adaptive testing: Overview and introduction. Applied psychological
          measurement, 23(3), 187-194.
          Mills, C. N.  &Breithaupt, K. J. (2016). Current Issues in Computer-Based Testing. In Craig, S. Wells ve MollyFoulk-
          ner-Bond (Eds.), Educational Measurement: From Fondations to Future, (p. 208-220).
          Nalbantoğlu Yılmaz, F. (2021). Comparing paper-pencil and computer-based tests: A meta-analysis study in the
          sample of Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 93, 279-300, DOI: 10.14689/ejer.2021.93.13
          Öz, H., &Özturan, T. (2018). Computer-based and paper-based testing: Does the test administration mode in fluence
          the reliability and validity of achievementtests? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(1), 67-85.
          Parshall, C. G., Spray, J. A., Kalohn, J. C., &Davey, T. (2002). Practical considerations in computer-basedtesting.
          New York: Springer.
          Şen, Ö. F. (2022). Bilgisayar Ortamında Bireye Uyarlanmış Testlerde Maddeyi Yeniden Cevaplayabilmenin Ölçme
          Kesinliğine Etkisinin İncelenmesi (Doktora tezi), Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
          van der Linden, W.J. &Glas, C.A.W.,eds (2000). Computer-adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice, KluwerAcademic
          Publishers, Boston.
          Wagner,  I.,Loesche,  P  &Bißantz,  S.  (2022)    Low-stakes  performance  testing  in  Germany  by  the  VERA  assess-
          ment: analysis of the mode effects between computer-based testing and paper-pencil testing https://doi.org/10.1007/
          s10212-021-00532-6 European Journal of Psychology of Education 37:531–549.
          Way, D. W. &Robin, F. (2016). The history of computer-based testing. Ed. J. S. Wells ve M. Faulkner-Bond. Edu-
          cational  Measurement:  From  Foundations  to  Future  (s.185-207).  The  Guilford  Press.  https://psycnet.apa.org/re-
          cord/2016-24406-011.
          Weiss, D. J. (1982). Improving measurement quality and efficiency with adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Me-
          asurement, 6, 473–492.
          Zenisky, A. L. (2005). Computer-based Test Designs. InBrian S. Everitt& David C. Howell (Eds.) Encyclopedia of
          Statistics in Behavioral Science. (p. 350-354), John Wiley&Sons, Ltd, Chichester.

                                                                                     .
                                                                                    Istanbul
                                                                                            ÖLÇME
         40                                                                                      (        .
                                                                                             DEGERLENDIRME
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45