Page 40 - İstanbul Ölçme Değerlendirme Dergisi
P. 40
Blais, J. G., &Raîche, G. (2010). Features of the sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive
testing according to two stopping rules. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11(4), 424-431.
Cassady, J. C., &Gridley, B. E. (2005). The Effects of Online Formative and Summative Assessment on Test Anxiety
and Performance. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 4(1). Retrieved from https://ejournals.bc.e-
du/index.php/jtla/article/view/1648.
Cui, Z., Liu, C., He, Y., &Chen, H. (2018). Comparison of algorithms that allow item review in computerized adaptive-
testing , ACT Research Report No:17009.
Geisinger, K. F., &Usher-Tate, B. J. (2016). A Brief History of Educational Testing and Psychometrics, In Craig, S.
Wells ve MollyFoulkner-Bond (Eds.) Educational Measurement: From Foundations to Future, (p.3-20) New York,
London: The Guilford Press.
Hendrickson, A. (2007). An NCME Instructional Module on MultistageTesting. Educational Measurement: Issues and
Practice, 26(2), 44–52. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00093.
Jerrim, J. (2016). PISA 2012: how do results for the paper and computer tests compare? Assessment in Education:
Principles. Policy&Practice, 23(4), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1147420.
Jerrim, J., Micklewright, J., Heine, J.-H., Salzer, C., &McKeown, C. (2018). PISA 2015: how big is the ‘mode effect’
and what has been done about it? Oxford Review of Education, 44(4), 476–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.
2018.1430025.
Johnson, M. &Green, S. (2006). On-Line Mathematics Assessment: The Impact of Mode on Performance and Ques-
tion Answering Strategies. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4(5).
Leucth, R. M. (2005). Computer-Adaptive Testing. Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science In Brian S. Eve-
ritt& David C. Howell (Eds.)(p. 343-350), John Wiley&Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
Luecht, R. M. &&Sireci, S. G. (2011). A Review of Models for Computer-BasedTesting, Research Report 2011-12,
College Board.
Lync, S. (2022). Adapting Paper-Based Tests for Computer Administration: Lessons Learned from 30 Years of Mode
ıstanbul larworks.umass.edu/pare/vol27/iss1/22
Effects Studies in Education. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, vol. 27, Article 22, https://scho-
. Meijer, R. R.,&Nering, M. L. (1999). Computerized adaptive testing: Overview and introduction. Applied psychological
measurement, 23(3), 187-194.
Mills, C. N. &Breithaupt, K. J. (2016). Current Issues in Computer-Based Testing. In Craig, S. Wells ve MollyFoulk-
ner-Bond (Eds.), Educational Measurement: From Fondations to Future, (p. 208-220).
Nalbantoğlu Yılmaz, F. (2021). Comparing paper-pencil and computer-based tests: A meta-analysis study in the
sample of Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 93, 279-300, DOI: 10.14689/ejer.2021.93.13
Öz, H., &Özturan, T. (2018). Computer-based and paper-based testing: Does the test administration mode in fluence
the reliability and validity of achievementtests? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(1), 67-85.
Parshall, C. G., Spray, J. A., Kalohn, J. C., &Davey, T. (2002). Practical considerations in computer-basedtesting.
New York: Springer.
Şen, Ö. F. (2022). Bilgisayar Ortamında Bireye Uyarlanmış Testlerde Maddeyi Yeniden Cevaplayabilmenin Ölçme
Kesinliğine Etkisinin İncelenmesi (Doktora tezi), Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
van der Linden, W.J. &Glas, C.A.W.,eds (2000). Computer-adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice, KluwerAcademic
Publishers, Boston.
Wagner, I.,Loesche, P &Bißantz, S. (2022) Low-stakes performance testing in Germany by the VERA assess-
ment: analysis of the mode effects between computer-based testing and paper-pencil testing https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10212-021-00532-6 European Journal of Psychology of Education 37:531–549.
Way, D. W. &Robin, F. (2016). The history of computer-based testing. Ed. J. S. Wells ve M. Faulkner-Bond. Edu-
cational Measurement: From Foundations to Future (s.185-207). The Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/re-
cord/2016-24406-011.
Weiss, D. J. (1982). Improving measurement quality and efficiency with adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Me-
asurement, 6, 473–492.
Zenisky, A. L. (2005). Computer-based Test Designs. InBrian S. Everitt& David C. Howell (Eds.) Encyclopedia of
Statistics in Behavioral Science. (p. 350-354), John Wiley&Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
.
Istanbul
ÖLÇME
40 ( .
DEGERLENDIRME